home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
- Path: howland.reston.ans.net!torn!news!benn1
- From: benn1@uwindsor.ca (John Benn)
- Subject: Re: OS features
- X-Nntp-Posting-Host: server.uwindsor.ca
- Message-ID: <DL773I.CBr@news.uwindsor.ca>
- Sender: news@news.uwindsor.ca (Usenet)
- Organization: University of Windsor
- References: <92747544038@PAPA.NORTH.DE> <4csgvl$dje@ousrvr3.oulu.fi> <60mk$BB8y7B@supersonic.ruhr.de> <cg.762h@ami-cg.GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jan 1996 01:06:54 GMT
-
- In article <cg.762h@ami-cg.GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA>,
- Chris Gray <cg@ami-cg.GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA> wrote:
- >In article <60mk$BB8y7B@supersonic.ruhr.de> wocket@supersonic.ruhr.de
- >(Andreas Wohlfeld) writes:
- >
- >The new PPC Amigas will not run *any* of the old software, unless AT is
- >able to produce a 68K emulator on PPC (such as by dealing with Apple). If
- >that route is taken the emulation can emulate the old OS features as well.
-
- I think that they have to worry about it to an extent. AT knows
- that they have to appeal first to the original users of the Amiga.
- Compatibility is then an issue.
-
- >People in this discussion are saying that since the move to PPC breaks all
- >old code because of hardware, why not take the opportunity to advance
- >the OS at the same time? That way code is broken only once, rather than
- >twice - once by hardware and then later (or earlier) by software.
-
- I agree that the PPC native code shouldn't worry too much about
- breaking old software, but it should be possible to run AmigaOS 3.1
- as well as the new PowerAmigaOS 4.0.
-
- >I'm just not worried about games. If there is a hardware platform that
- >is sold in good quantities, and whose owners are interested in buying
- >games, then games will be written for it. Games usually have a short
- >lifetime compared to other software, so can move to a new OS/CPU without
- >too much pain in the industry.
-
- There are probably 2 or 3 million people world-wide that are
- still actually using their Amigas (of the 5 or so million sold).
- If AT can put a new PowerAmiga together that can run even 50%
- of the old software as well as provide new features (hardware/sofware)
- that are only available in "PPC-mode" then they'll have a good
- chance of getting a million or so users to buy the new machines.
- This is a nice level of sales: ~$1 billion. If this happens,
- the word will get out and the Amiga has a chance to become mainstream.
- If that happens then the sky's the limit. You know what the Amiga
- community is capable of. If AmigaOS 4.0 is available in PC stores
- everywhere for any CHRP compliant machine for say $100 and it gets
- all the great hackers and free thinkers behind it that the Amiga
- has been known to attract, then anything is possible. Let's face
- facts, if the Amiga were ANY other computer it would have died
- 2 years ago, but Amiga users are spaz. The attitude after CBM
- went down wasn't "Shit, time to jump ship!" if was more like
- "Looks like we're going to have to write our own software for
- a couple of years". It's this kind of attitude which has created
- a large pool of "software companies in waiting" which are writing
- shareware right now.
-
- The initial sales of the PowerAmiga are VERY important. It will
- determine the number and quality of developers which decide to write
- new OS4.0 compliant software. I mean, if I knew for a fact that
- AT could sell 1 million PowerAmigas in 1997 I'd start a software
- company myself and start developing software in earnest, but it's
- still hard to gauge how well they can do.
-
- I still think there are big opportunities for the Amiga. PC
- users aren't really machine loyal to the extent that Amiga users
- are. They switch OSes at the drop of a hat. The rational ones
- see Win95/Dos as a necessary evil and OS/2 as a configuration
- nightmare. But, the Amiga needs to have some impressive software
- for AmigaOS to make into millions of homes.
-
- >I am more concerned about the other kinds of applications - paint programs,
- >music programs, word processors, databases, compilers, editors, etc. They
- >can survive if they are not written in assembler, since they can be
- >recompiled for the new CPU. Having to change them to use a somewhat
- >different (but philosophically the same) OS is some work, but probably
- >not that much.
-
- They need to make the transition as painless as possible.
- --
- *** Are you willing to sacrifice all that you are ***
- *** to keep all that you have? - G'Kar, Babylon-5 ***
-